September 25, 2007

Mike and the Mad Dog are the Ultimate Anti-Mets

from MetsLifer.com


I can't even talk about last night's loss because it's not even worth typing about it. But something else that got me aggravated last night was listening to Mike and the Mad Dog on WFAN on my way home from work.

I turned on the radio just as they were playing back Howie Rose's call of Delgado's 3-run homer on Sunday. Howie Rose was obviously psyched to see Delgado hit one which gave the Mets the lead. But the thing that bothered me is how Mike Francesa and Chris Russo just started railing on Howie Rose for being that excited about a call. They were talking about how it wasn't a big deal and that this Mets win didn't mean anything because the Phillies had already lost.

Have these guys even been following the Mets? (probably not) What do you mean this win didn't mean anything? These guys get paid for this? Of course it was a big win. It gave us that 2 game cushion we so desperately needed. If we didn't win that game we'd now be looking at a 1 game lead. Morons.

Then they went on to further show their ignorance by talking about how Willie Randolph has done a great job this year managing the team. Whaaaaaaaaat? These are the same guys who question Randolph's move pretty much every other week and now they want to crown him manager of the year? Have they seen the substitutions Randolph has made. The bad double switches. The reliance on Guillermo Mota. The refusal to play Milledge at first.

That's it. I can't listen to the "Jerk and the Fatman" (as Imus used to call them) any more. As much as it pains me to say this, but Michael Kay is actually a more unbiased talk show host when it comes to the Mets. Now Michael Kay is a guy I've detested for a long time, but I got to tell you that Mike and the Mad Dog have lost all credibility when it comes to Mets baseball.

8 comments:

Anonymous said...

i hate those guys

Anonymous said...

why dont they just go to the yankees station and be gone from mets land

Anonymous said...

i wish they would just choke on each others words and leave

Anonymous said...

if your on a mets station then talk mets ...

Anonymous said...

dont they say that they love sterling's calls...that he is an entertainr and puts every call over the top?

theyn why do they have to go andslam the mets announcers?

Anonymous said...

because they hate the mets!

channelXRFR said...

Best part of the fan taking Imus off the air? I now listen to ESPN Radio for my sports coverage... The difference between WFAN and ESPN is night and day. ESPN has more programing, is more entertaining, features stronger personalities, wider range of guests. Overall ESPN is 10X better then the FAN!!!

baseball dvds said...

I am afraid that this statement is not correct"
Have these guys even been following the Mets? (probably not) What do you mean this win didn't mean anything? These guys get paid for this? Of course it was a big win.
".I would appreciate if you can further elaborate this.Thank you.
baseball dvds.